IPCC 4th Report - Main findings
Climate Change
(CC) issues are presented widely in media these days and frequently the same
messages (facts) are used by NGOs in their campaigns or school teachers in
their teaching process. CC related campaigns or teaching are sometimes ending
with a bit of frustration (another bad news issue) or reluctance how the public
can stop the CC or influence the whole process. INFORSE member NGOs have the
unique position here because their activities are primarily oriented on
sustainable energy development and are offering the solutions to the threat of
CC. What is really needed for NGOs and teachers is to get the scientific
knowledge of CC in a relatively simple way which can be used as the support for
argumentation towards sustainable energy development. This report is targeted
at exactly this goal: providing the NGOs and teachers with the CC knowledge
based on latest scientific data which can be helpful in their daily work. The content
of this document is based on The IPCC 4th Assessment Report (AR4).
Why
IPCC 4th Report and why the NGOs should use IPCC facts?
There are many
papers, reports and news published daily on CC issue. Despite the fact that
majority of them are fully in line with the latest scientific data there are
some of them which are trying to present CC in just the opposite way.
Unfortunately even some politicians are influenced by these confusing facts and
thus they contribute to confusing the public.
United Nations
(UN) is aware of this situation which lasts for many years and in order to
reduce the confusion they supported to establish the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) which now has the scientific credibility and capacity to
provide up to date data. The IPCC was established by the United Nations Environment Programme
(UNEP) and the World
Meteorological Organization and has a long history of publishing its
reports on CC. This year (2007) they produced the 4th report which
is the basis for the information provided below. It is also important to note that the IPCC
does depend on consensus and it means that they have to be quite cautious in
what they say.
Climate change is
now a fact recognized by scientists and the governments. Thus all relevant
scientific information should be the starting point for INFORSE member NGOs in
order to link their efforts oriented on renewables
with climate change issues.
Who
is behind the IPCC:
The IPCC has the
highest international credibility in terms of CC science. IPCC reports are
written by teams of authors, nominated by governments and international
organizations. They come from universities, research centers, business and
environmental associations from all over the world. More than 800 contributing
authors and more than 450 lead authors were involved in the writing of the AR4.
Review is an essential part of the IPCC process, to ensure an objective and
complete assessment of current information. More than 2500 scientific expert
reviewers were involved in the two-stage scientific and technical review
process of the AR4. As usual the government officials were involved in work on
the summary reports, but the scientist (authors), who are not paid for this,
had the final word over the thousands of pages of texts.
Structure
of IPCC 4th Assessment Report :
The IPCC 4th
Assessment Report (AR4) summarized the scientific results related to causes and
consequences of climate change accumulated since 1950. AR4 consists of four volumes covering the results of different
working groups (WG):
WG 1: "The Physical Science Basis"
WG 2: "Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability"
WG 3: "Mitigation of Climate Change"
"The Synthesis Report"
WG 1 Report,
"The physical science basis", assesses the current state of
knowledge about the natural and human drivers of climate change, reflecting the
progress of the climate change science in the observation of the atmosphere,
the Earth's surface and oceans. It provides a paleoclimatic
perspective and evaluates future projections of climate change.
Working Group 2
Report addresses "Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability": It
provides a detailed analysis of observed changes in natural and human systems
and the relationship between those observed changes and climate change, as well
as a detailed assessment of projected future vulnerability, impacts, and
response measures to adapt to climatic changes for main sectors and regions.
Working Group 3
Report on "Mitigation of climate change" analyses mitigation
options for the main sectors in the near term, addressing also cross sectorial matters such as synergies, co-benefits,
trade-offs, and links with other policy objectives. It also provides information
on long term mitigation strategies, for various stabilization levels, paying
special attention to implications of different short-term strategies for
achieving long-term goals.
AR4 "Synthesis
Report" is an overall scientific view on climate change that
integrates and synthesizes all information from the three volumes around 6
topics areas.
For each report a
Summary for Policymakers (SPM) is included. The SPM therefore represents the
point of agreement: participating governments acknowledge that there is enough
scientific evidence worldwide to support the document's statements. Thanks to
the depth of its scientific work and to the value of its intergovernmental
nature, IPCC work is very much policy relevant. Its assessment reports played a
decisive role in inducing governments to adopt the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. However, IPCC is neutral
with respect to policy and its assessment reports are not policy prescriptive.
What are the most important
results of the report?
The Physical Science Basis - Observations
Carbon dioxide,
methane and nitrous oxide levels have increased significantly over
pre-industrial levels due to human activities. Carbon dioxide due to fossil
fuel burning and land use change, methane and nitrous oxide due to agriculture.
The global mean concentration of CO2 was 379 ppm in
2005 compared to 280 ppm in pre-industrial time.
Source: IPCC
AR4. 2007
IPCC observed that :
Source: IPCC
AR4. 2007
Impacts and Projections
Temperatures
The global climate
temperature will likely increase by 2,4 – 6,4 (relative to 1980-1999 temperatures).For
the next two decades, a warming of about 0,2°C per decade is projected for a
range of emission scenarios. Even if the concentrations of all greenhouse gases
and aerosols had been kept constant at year 2000 levels, a further warming of about
0,1°C per decade would be expected. Since IPCC’s first report in 1990, assessed projections have
suggested global average temperature increases between about 0,15°C and 0,3°C per decade for 1990 to 2005. This can now be
compared with observed values of about 0,2°C per
decade, strengthening confidence in near-term projections.
It is expected that we will
experience:
See
level rise
Sea level rise is
expected to reach 0,26 – 0,59 m at 2090-2099 relative
to 1980-1999. There is strong evidence that global sea level gradually rose in
the 20th century and is currently rising at an increased rate, after a period
of little change between AD 0 and AD 1900. Sea level is projected to rise at an
even greater rate in this century. The two major causes of global sea level
rise are thermal expansion of the oceans (water expands as it warms) and the
loss of land-based ice due to increased melting. Thermal expansion alone would
lead to 0,3 to 0,8 m of sea level rise by 2300
(relative to 1980–1999). The IPCC concluded that there is no solid scientific
understanding of how rapidly the vast stores of ice in polar
regions will melt, so their estimates on new sea levels were based
mainly on how much the warmed oceans will expand, and not on contributions from
the melting of ice now on land. Nevertheless they estimate that the
anthropogenic warming and sea level rise would continue for centuries due to
the time scales associated with climate processes and feedbacks, even if
greenhouse gas concentrations were to be stabilized.
Contraction of the
Greenland Ice Sheet is projected to continue to contribute to sea level rise
after 2100. Snow cover is projected to contract. Widespread increases in thaw
depth are projected over most permafrost regions. Sea ice is projected to
shrink in both the Arctic and Antarctic. In some projections, arctic
late-summer sea ice disappears almost entirely by the latter part of the 21st
century.
It is very likely
that hot extremes, heat waves and heavy precipitation events will continue to
become more frequent.
Observations of
Greenland and Antarctica have forced IPCC to conclude that there is a 50%
chance that widespread ice sheet loss "may no longer be avoided"
because of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Such melting would raise sea
levels by four to six meters. It would cause "major changes in coastline
and inundation of low-lying areas" and require "costly and
challenging" efforts to move millions of people and infrastructure from
vulnerable areas. The previous report (AR 3),
concluded that the chance of such an event was "not well known, but
probably very low". Areas such as the Maldives can be hardly hit and
low-lying countries such as the Netherlands and Bangladesh, as well as coastal
cities including London, New York and Tokyo, can face frequent flooding.
Storms
Based on a range
of models, it is likely that
future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense,
with larger peak wind speeds and more heavy precipitation associated with
ongoing increases of tropical sea surface temperatures. There is less
confidence in projections of a global decrease in numbers of tropical cyclones.
Precipitation
Increases in the
amount of precipitation are very likely in high latitudes, while decreases are
likely in most subtropical land regions (by as much as about 20% in 2100).
Heavy precipitation events are also expected. Frequency (or proportion of total
rainfall from heavy falls) increases over most areas. Intense tropical cyclone
activity increases are also expected.
Other
impacts
The IPCC also mentioned
a new chemical consequence of the buildup of carbon dioxide in oceans: a drop
in the pH of seawater as oceans absorb billions of tons of carbon dioxide,
which forms carbonic acid when partly dissolved. This could have an impact on
some kinds of corals and plankton.
Uncertainties
There are still
some open questions remaining about the speed and extent of some impending
change. These uncertainties are related to the future pollution trends, size of
population and the complex relation between the greenhouse emissions, clouds,
pollution, the oceans and other factors, which both emits and soaks up
greenhouse gases.
Confidence
level
It is very
unlikely that the 20th-century warming can be explained by natural causes. The
late 20th century has been unusually warm. Palaeoclimatic
reconstructions show that the second half of the 20th century was likely the
warmest 50-year period in the Northern Hemisphere in the last 1300 years. This
rapid warming is consistent with the scientific understanding of how the
climate should respond to a rapid increase in greenhouse gases like that which
has occurred over the past century, and the warming is inconsistent with the
scientific understanding of how the climate should respond to natural external
factors such as variability in solar output and volcanic activity.
Source: IPCC
AR4. 2007
Mitigation
- Technology
In the chapter
related to key mitigation technologies IPCC mentioned for energy sector
following options :
In the transport sector the
main options are :
There are also other
sectors covered like buildings, industry, agriculture etc.
IPCC mentioned
that the renewable energy generally has a positive effect on energy security,
employment and on air quality. Given costs relative to other supply options,
renewable electricity, which accounted for 18% of the electricity supply in
2005, can have a 30-35% share of the total electricity supply in 2030 at carbon
prices up to 50 US dollars per ton of CO2 equivalent.
It is important to
note that nuclear industry welcomed AR4, which endorses nuclear energy’s status
as one of a range of “commercially available climate change mitigating
technologies”. The IPCC said nuclear energy is likely to increase its share of
the global electricity market from 16 to 18 percent by 2030, given costs
relative to other supply options at carbon prices up to 50 US dollars per ton
of CO2 equivalent. AR4 said that issues such as safety, waste and weapons
proliferation continue to be constraints for the nuclear energy industry.
Conclusions
For the first time
it was concluded that global warming is "unequivocal" and that human
activity is the main driver, "very likely" causing most of the rise
in temperatures since 1950. It was also said that the average temperatures
would probably increase by 4 deg. Celsius during this century if emissions
continue to rise. Even under its most optimistic scenario, based on a declining
world population and a rapid switch to clean technology, temperatures are still
likely to rise by 1,8 deg. Celsius.
The IPCC also said
that the world is already committed to centuries of warming, shifting weather
patterns and rising seas, resulting from the buildup of gases in the atmosphere
that trap heat. But it was also
mentioned in the AR4 that the global warming can be substantially slowed by
prompt action.
AR4 is the first
IPCC report in which the scientists declare with near certainty (more than 90
percent confidence) that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases arising from
human activities are the main cause behind the global warming since 1950. In
previous IPCC report published in 2001 (AR3), the scientists put the confidence
level at between 66 and 90 percent.
AR4 also concluded
that if carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere reach twice their
pre-industrial levels, the global climate will likely warm by 2,4 – 6,4
(relative to 1980-1999 temperatures). Sea level rise is expected to reach 0,26 – 0,59 m at 2090-2099 relative to 1980-1999).
Continued
greenhouse gas emissions at or above current rates would cause further warming
and induce many changes in the global climate system during the 21st century
that would very likely be larger than those observed during the 20th century.
The rising temperatures could force hundreds of species to become extinct and
trigger conflicts in countries struck by droughts and severe flooding.